<iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-K3L4M3" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">

Features Australia

Luvvies guide to defining a woman

Trans rights do not trump women’s identity and safety

23 April 2022

9:00 AM

23 April 2022

9:00 AM

Should someone who cannot define a woman be the nation’s top health bureaucrat? ‘Balls’, said the Queen. ‘If I had them, I’d be King’. Jill Clayburgh’s lament in An Unmarried Woman might assist Professor Brendan Murphy. Is he medically illiterate or just too cowed by the trans bullies? Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson declined to define a woman because she’s not a biologist.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Get 10 issues
for $10

Subscribe to The Spectator Australia today for the next 10 magazine issues, plus full online access, for just $10.

  • Delivery of the weekly magazine
  • Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
  • Spectator podcasts and newsletters
  • Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or

Unlock this article

REGISTER

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first month for free, then just $2 a week for the remainder of your first year.


Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Close