UK Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, doesn’t know Anthony Albanese particularly well. It was clear from the outset, despite their embraces on stage.
Opening his Renew Britain speech, Starmer confused the room by saying the Australian Labor Party won ‘a landslide victory earlier this Summer’.
The fact-check: Albanese attracted one of the lowest primary votes in recorded history during an Autumn election.
‘A key part is standing up to the divisive politics of the Right…’
Starmer’s complaint about division loosely translates as ‘anything that divides public opinion from government policy’.
Leaders frightened of public opinion are redefining debate as divisive. If the ghost of Churchill so-much as side-eyes Starmer, he wraps himself in the Online Safety Act like an infant dragging its blanket around.
Reform, under Nigel Farage’s leadership, has Starmer running scared. A few weeks ago, his government panicked when several million Brits filled the streets of London, brandishing flags, demanding an end to mass migration and anti-West ideology. If an election were held today, Starmer would be gone, and Farage would be Prime Minister with a small rabble of Tories locking arms in coalition.
What caused voters to change?
The UK has experienced a frightening premonition of third-world mass migration shaping Britain’s future. Lived experience has finally cracked through, dismantling the ideological brainwashing of the education system and now the bedrock of Westminster is rumbling underfoot. Even the young have turned against the Left.
All this panic about division is a nonsense from Starmer.
He was quite happy to endorse the disruptive protests which bullied citizens such as Strike4Climate, Extinction Rebellion, Just Stop Oil, Palestine, and Black Lives Matter. Only patriot protests and freedom marches have been labelled ‘dangerous’, fascist, and divisive.
There has been no attempt to conceal this hypocrisy, hence Starmer’s moniker ‘Two-Tier Keir’.
Starmer’s Labour is today trying to cover its tracks with a relentless propaganda tour through legacy media, painting itself as the great unifier and peacemaker while the centre of Western Enlightenment rots from the core, starting with Sadiq Khan’s London.
Australia isn’t doing much better, with race politics, business closures, debt, foreign interference, and gang violence besieging Melbourne and only a few voluntary machete surrender bins offered up in return.
Despite a hemisphere of protective padding, Albanese is scared of Farage.
Scared of Farage inspiring something.
‘I don’t want to see the rise of populist organisations, such as [Reform]. I’ve met with the mainstream opposition party here and I’m involved in parties of governance.’
Hello Prime Minister… One Nation is the next Reform. We are the true opposition.
Of course Albanese doesn’t want a Reform-inspired movement in Australia. Reform is set to win the next election and banish UK Labour to the pages of European history as another failed experiment in socialism. If Albanese makes it to the historical record, it will be as one of Starmer’s pilot fish, hanging under his fin beside Canada and France, with the great angler of America hunting them into open water.
Speaking of America…
Albanese flagged his intent to discuss ‘progressive patriotism’ at the upcoming White House meeting with President Donald Trump.
No doubt that will go well.
What is progressive patriotism?
A love of country with several pages of accompanying fine print? A nation without a flag, without an anthem, without history, and without a future? The embrace of a borderless, soulless, incoherent melting pot?
Is Albanese to be the bellboy standing in the lobby of Hotel Australia?
The fruits of this socialist love-in are of deep concern.
If Starmer and Albanese are jointly afraid of the Faragian Right, we might ask, what will they do? How do you stop a dissenting movement?
Both of these ‘leaders’ have shown enthusiasm for the misuse of online safety legislation to disrupt political communication. Starmer has already been questioned about national flags, news items, and parliamentary debates being blocked with age restrictions.
In December, Albanese’s Under16 Social Media bill will create the biggest imposition to the digital realm outside of North Korea and China.
This digital barbed wire will be dragged across Australia under pain of serious fines for social media companies who refuse to bend to Albanese’s misinformed demands.
While the people of Australia are forced to navigate a mandatory biometric gate, Albanese had the hide to hold Starmer’s hand and proclaim that they were fighting to defend democracy itself.
‘Tearing things down is easy, but it doesn’t leave you with anything. The low politics of fear and resentment are easy, but they only divide the country. They don’t advance it. The things worth doing are hard. And things worth doing are worth fighting for.’
To Albanese, I would say this… Sometimes the hardest thing for a Prime Minister to do is nothing. Attempting to control public conversation – to fact-check the world, filter criticism, and police thoughts – is the mark of a leader who has confused control with governance.
Labor’s policies are drafted out of fear and supported by paranoid politicians on both sides of Parliament.
If public criticism does not make you stronger, Albanese, then your failures are structural.
‘Unity of labour reflects the power of solidarity to drive change…’
Albanese may be right. The UK is uniting … uniting behind Nigel Farage and the promise of restoring the nation. The change they want has been echoed on the streets of Australia. In every pub. On every beach. At every holiday BBQ.
People want their countries back.
We, the people, want the economy freed from the chains of socialism.
And they want the incurable division of multiculturalism dissolved as an ideology.
Each of our countries is a nation. A singular. An entity that if it is to function must be coherent.
We are One Nation.
