As the High Court judges retire to consider the Science Case of the Year, Peter Ridd v James Cook University, the underlying issue remains … well, underlying. And that is the matter of reliable science. Ridd’s ‘transgression’ was to point out that better quality control over research into the Great Barrier Reef is desirable.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Easter flash sale:
10 issues for $1
Subscribe this Easter and get the next 10 issues of the magazine, plus website and app access, all for just $1.
- Weekly delivery of the magazine
- Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
- Spectator Australia podcasts and newsletters
- Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or
Comments
Easter flash sale: 10 issues for $1
Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
CLAIM OFFER 10 issues for $1Already a subscriber? Log in