As the High Court judges retire to consider the Science Case of the Year, Peter Ridd v James Cook University, the underlying issue remains … well, underlying. And that is the matter of reliable science. Ridd’s ‘transgression’ was to point out that better quality control over research into the Great Barrier Reef is desirable.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Black Friday sale
Subscribe today and get 10 weeks of The Spectator Australia for just $1
- Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
- The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
- Spectator podcasts and newsletters
- Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or
Comments
Black Friday sale
Subscribe today and get 10 weeks of The Spectator Australia for just $1
SUBSCRIBEAlready a subscriber? Log in