Just writing about this radio programme makes me feel nauseous

Plus: the World Service’s documentary about Tibet’s female football team shows why we must preserve this corner of the BBC from further cuts

6 June 2015

9:00 AM

6 June 2015

9:00 AM

If you’re in the least bit squeamish you’d better stop reading now. What follows is not for those who blanch at Casualty and come over all faint at the sight of blood. I’m told it’s a first for radio — following an operation in real time and going right inside the experience.

It began at breakfast time on Tuesday on Radio Five Live as we listened to Stephen, a patient at Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham. He’d woken up at 3 a.m. to hear one of the nurses clip-clopping down the corridor towards him. She’d come to tell him that at last they’d found a heart which they hoped would be a good match, and the operation which he had been waiting for to save his life would take place in just a few hours. How did he feel about it?

Heart Transplant Day then proceeded to give us brief updates throughout the day as Stephen underwent the massive eight-hour operation. Not that this was ‘live’ radio. That would have been too risky. But knowing it was recorded did not take away from the impact of hearing just exactly what Stephen (or rather his inert body) was going through, tube by tube, suture by suture.

‘The heart has just been taken out,’ said Chris Warburton, the news reporter with a cast-iron stomach. ‘Here it is on a table in a plastic bowl. It’s quite a size,’ he added, ‘bigger than I would have thought …and it’s just made a movement. Right there. Completely independently from Stephen’s body.’ I’m feeling nauseous just writing about it.

‘Let me describe the colours of it,’ he carried on, relentlessly. ‘It’s not red, it’s yellowing, with purple veins running through it … It’s much cleaner than you might imagine.’

Meanwhile Stephen was lying on the operating table with all the machines attached to him registering a flat line. No heartbeat. No vital signs. He was a body without a heart, kept alive by technology — and the skill of the operating team.

Later on, after the new heart had been inserted, the anaesthetist told us she wanted to make sure Stephen had ‘a smooth landing’ as he came off all the machines and began relying on his new organ. She was closest to the patient, right by his head, but told us, ‘I have to say I don’t think of it as this person. I think about getting the numbers right.’

Husain Husaini, the producer, told Radio Times, ‘You couldn’t do that kind of programming on TV.’ It was too real, too immediate, too insightful. ‘Stephen’s heart transplant was progressing while most people were having a normal working day.’

Over on the World Service later in the day, Soccer Nuns introduced us to the ‘Snow Lionesses’, the women’s football team of Tibet. Their idea of the beautiful game is rather different from Fifa’s (which has yet to recognise the Tibetan team because Tibet is a non-sovereign country). Most of the young women players are living in exile in India, because of China’s oppression of the Tibetan people. Ivan Broadhead went to meet them in soccer camp in Dehradun, in the foothills of the Himalayas, as they prepared to turn themselves into an international team. They’ve been described as ‘modern-day nuns’ because of the sacrifices they have made and their total dedication to the sport.

A 16-year-old player last saw her parents ten years ago. They sent her away from Tibet when she was six so that she could grow up in a free society. The vice-captain of the team was only 12 when she escaped from her home country ten years ago, walking across the Himalayan mountains in freezing, icy conditions. The soles of her shoes were destroyed. A young male refugee who was with her on their journey into exile suffered from frostbite and had to have all his toes and fingers amputated. ‘When I wear the Tibetan football kit I feel so proud,’ she told us. Another team member plays for her brother, who was imprisoned by the Nepalese after going on a peace march.

It was so refreshing to hear a story about football that was not riddled with corruption; that talked about sport as a means of bringing people together (the organiser of the soccer camp was from New Jersey). Such programmes, with their alternative take on the news, make it no surprise that the World Service is a hugely successful podcast factory. It has just been announced that since July 2007 (when the first podcasts were released by the World Service, available to anyone, anywhere in the world, via the internet), there have been one billion downloads of its programmes — that’s 28 million each month.

Let’s hope there are no more cuts to the funding for this jewel in the BBC’s empire (which has already seen virtually all of its budget for drama disappear), and that even if the licence fee is eventually abandoned some other form of subsidy will ensure the World Service survives not just as an impartial source of news but also as a gateway to other stories, other lives.

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first 10 weeks for just $10

Show comments
  • Sean Grainger

    Ms C you front line media commentators have got to get on top of the numbers. Radio 4 costs but £100million a year which as you know is a tenner each for us aficianados. Pushing that up to £12 will probably pay for the anachronistic — there are blogs ‘n’ all and YouTube these days — World Service too. It is NOT an argument for maintaining a poll tax propping up the beyond bloated corp.

    • Hironimous Nostril

      It isn’t a poll tax. Oops.

  • paulus

    Well they have started to cut the World service, obviously on the assumption that Britain would rather pay a poll tax keeping unemployable bureaucrats off the street. The hubris and stupidity of these people is incredible, their own actions have made them redundant.

    • Hironimous Nostril

      It isn’t a poll tax.


    The bbc should no longer receive one penny from the enforced TV Licence.

    The bbc’s credibility was destroyed in the build up to the Scottish independence referendum when they disclosed that there was no requirement for the organisation to broadcast impartial coverage out with the official campaign period.

    The bbc then operated as a unionist state broadcaster for the duration of the campaign, from misreporting, failing to report, to broadcasting complete and utter lies, the bbc unionist propaganda without doubt affected the democratic process.

    The bbc news reporting has the impartiality and credibility of state broadcasters such as RT.

    • There was no requirement though as Holyrood has no remit over broadcasting so the BBC were simply stating the truth and as we all know the truth is something you simply dont handle very well.


        The bbc’s “truth”, as approved by The Ministry of Truth & Appropriate Thinking.

        • Its the British Broadcasting Corporation FFS.

          • SNP “AJOCKALYPSE”

            Exactly, bbc news and politics no longer have any credibility in their reporting due the propaganda output.

            The British Unionist Broadcasting Corporation would be a far more appropriate name for this discredited organisation.

            Regardless, no one should have to pay a penny to receive biased state propaganda.

          • Ohh dear……………..

    • Hironimous Nostril

      If the Yes vote had won you would be sunk. Why anyone would want a clueless moron like Salmond in charge in charge of their country is beyond me.


        It would appear that many things are beyond you.

        Anyway, whatever Scotland does will be decided by the people of Scotland…… You should worry about decisions in your own country.

        • Hironimous Nostril

          If the Yes vote had prevailed it would have been decisions based on what Scotland could afford.

          • SNP “AJOCKALYPSE”

            If it had been a YES vote Scots would no longer be subscribing to the bbc.

          • Hironimous Nostril

            The land of milk and honey, where nothing costs you any money.

          • Fred Uttlescay

            I really like the folk music on the Alba channel.

  • Muttley

    The BBC World Service is, I’m sorry to say, full of the same left-wng PC nonsense as the rest of the rotten organisation. I don’t want Britain represented abroad by the toxic BBC and I certainly don’t want to pay taxes or licence fees to support it. The whole shebang should be wound up, or at the very least thrown on its own resources.

    • Hironimous Nostril

      Right wing troll hates the Beeb shock.

  • Shorne

    Long live the BBC as a balance for the Right Wing dominated media of the Barclay Brothers, Harmsworth and Murdoch etc. and all for £0.39 a day. As long as it prompts comments like these I know it’s on the right track.
    Right let the reactionary bile spewing commence!

    • Richard Ferguson

      I’m afraid as a right-wing Tory I’ll have to disappoint you. The BBC has many, many flaws and needs to be shaken up but it still is so much better than the ghastly alternatives.

      • Shorne

        Well I’m far from disappointed, I voted Tory in 2010, not this time though as the Tory candidate was, as my old Granny used to say ‘As much use as a sick headache’…he won of course.

  • Gilbert White

    The amazing thing is the cost related to the poor, chip frying radio reception . How the natives manage to imbibe this curious blend of homely hand knitted Marxism has always amused me. The worst moment was a BBC drone nearly wetting herself interviewing Mandela. She suggested he become world president. Just about sums it up.

  • Cymrugel

    Quite good sometimes, but too often the news or current affairs reports are bland or superficial – mainly when describing affairs in countries that would not welcome direct criticism.