It is a terrible shame the chief legacy of our first female prime minister seems to be her so-called ‘misogyny speech’ – the sentiment of which certainly resounds with most women. But properly understood, Julia Gillard’s opposition to the then leader of the opposition’s censure motion was inappropriate. The subject matter of the motion, concerning allegations of serious parliamentary workplace sexual harassment by then House Speaker, Peter Slipper, who compared female genitalia to ‘shell-lessmussels’, was before the court.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe for just $2 a week
Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.
- Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
- The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
- Spectator podcasts and newsletters
- Full access to spectator.co.uk
Unlock this article
You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first month for free, then just $2 a week for the remainder of your first year.
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
SUBSCRIBEAlready a subscriber? Log in