The shameful evacuation of pets from Afghanistan

29 August 2021

1:56 PM

29 August 2021

1:56 PM

Two stories on the Afghan evacuation today combine to leave me full of bewildered rage.

The first, from the Times:

‘Britain may have to leave 1,000 Afghan support staff behind
Up to 1,100 Afghan citizens entitled to come to the UK are likely to be left behind as British forces withdraw from Afghanistan in the next 48 hours.
The RAF was expected last night to complete the evacuation of 15,000 Afghan and British citizens from Kabul airport despite the terrorist attacks. The military will have pulled out by the end of the weekend.
Ben Wallace, the defence secretary, said that between 800 and 1,100 Afghan interpreters and other support staff were unlikely to make it out. Up to 150 Britons are also likely to be left behind.’

The second, from the BBC:

‘Afghanistan: Pen Farthing through Kabul airport security with animals

An animal charity’s founder has made it through Kabul airport’s security, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) said.

Paul “Pen” Farthing was trying to get his staff and rescue animals out of Afghanistan when they became caught up in Thursday’s airport bomb blasts.

On Friday evening the MoD said Mr Farthing and his animals were assisted by the UK Armed Forces.

It added: “They are currently being supported while he awaits transportation.”‘

This is not a piece about the Whitehall processes around Pen Farthing’s charter flight, though I don’t think it takes much to listen to either Defence Secretary Ben Wallace or General Sir Nick Carter talk about this and infer that they’re uncomfortable with the time and resources they’ve had to devote to getting cats and dogs out of Kabul.

Nor is it a piece about the logistics around Farthing and his plane, its hold and the rest of it.

It’s about choices, and the allocation of time and effort. The first thing children studying economics are taught is the concept of opportunity cost. Every time you chose to allocate time, effort or resource to something, you decide that those things cannot be used on something else. A pound spent on apples cannot be spent on oranges. An hour spent watching TV cannot be used to study.

So go back to that MoD quote about supporting Pen Farthing in his efforts to transport animals. Now consider three simple facts.

  1. The British state has finite resources. It is bound by opportunity cost.
  2. The British state has chosen to devote some of its resources to help with the removal of animals from Afghanistan. Those resources cannot be used on other things.
  3. The British state will leave in Afghanistan around 1,000 human beings who have worked, at risk of their lives, furthering British policies and British interests. Those people want to leave Afghanistan because they fear that if they do not do so, they will be persecuted or killed.

There are doubtless many words for this situation, but the only one I can think of one: shameful.

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.

Show comments