<iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-K3L4M3" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">

The Wiki Man

What if Oxford PPE graduates on TV were made to wear pink conical hats?

27 June 2020

9:00 AM

27 June 2020

9:00 AM

You can’t discuss racial inequality without using the N-word. And you can’t debate social justice without adding the C-word and the F-word as well.

In this case the N-word is Nepotism, the C-word is Credentialism and the F-word is Favouritism.

What is often overlooked in the debate about social justice is that inequality of opportunity need not arise from the exercise of negative preferences but from a mildly positive, unintended bias operating in reverse.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Get 10 issues
for $10

Subscribe to The Spectator Australia today for the next 10 magazine issues, plus full online access, for just $10.

  • Delivery of the weekly magazine
  • Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
  • Spectator podcasts and newsletters
  • Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or

Unlock this article

REGISTER

Rory Sutherland is vice-chairman of Ogilvy UK.

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first month for free, then just $2 a week for the remainder of your first year.


Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Close