Bridge is such a complex, multi-layered game that a single hand can be approached in myriad ways, depending on the skill of the player. In fact, peering into the mind of a world-class player is a bit like entering another dimension; there are possibilities you didn’t even know existed.
At a recent pairs tournament, most North-South pairs bid and made 4on the deal below. How, I wondered, did Artur Malinowski manage an overtrick? His answer blew me away:
West (Justin Hackett) led a trump. Artur drew a second round, then ran the 9 to East’s A. East switched to a heart. West won the Q with his K, and returned the J to Artur’s A. Ten tricks were in the bag: 5 spades, the A, a ruff, two diamonds (via another finesse) and the A. But could West be squeezed in clubs and diamonds for an extra trick?
Here was Artur’s thinking: West was a top player. Had he held 4+ diamonds and the K, he would have foreseen the squeeze, and broken it up by playing a second diamond (sorry, this is tricky stuff). So Artur decided to place him with the J instead. He ruffed a heart in dummy and played the Q — a technique known as transferring the menace.
After capturing East’s K with his A he played trumps, reaching this position: A 4 105 opposite KJ10 7. West held uQ65 J. On the A West was squeezed. He discarded the J and Artur’s 10 became his 11th trick. Genius.
Subscribe to The Spectator Australia today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Subscribe – Try a month free