Cinema

You won’t care it’s been done before, because it’s never been done like this: Jungle Book reviewed

16 April 2016

9:00 AM

16 April 2016

9:00 AM

This Jungle Book is Disney’s remake of its animated classic of 1967, as beloved by all generations thereafter. Warner Bros also has a remake in the pipeline, directed by Andy Serkis, and due for release in 2018, so it looks as though we’ve reached peak Jungle Book remake, although I personally won’t be happy until Quentin Tarantino has a shot: ‘I’ve reached the top, but had to stop and that’s what’s bothering me …mother fucker!’

Many are scornful of these ‘reimaginings’, as they’re called, saying it indicates that Hollywood lacks original ideas. There may be some truth in this, but if we only ever held out for original ideas, we’d never have had Billy Wilder’s Some Like It Hot (a remake of the French film Fanfares of Love) or The Maltese Falcon, which had been adapted twice before, and which no one has ever understood, but is considered a classic all the same. Also, the history of cinema is the history of technology. Sound. Colour. CGI. 3D. So as technology evolves you can, I think, legitimately make the same film, but differently. And there’s no reason why different versions can’t happily coexist. Everyone spiralizes their vegetables now, but it doesn’t mean the carrot as a carrot has ceased to be. This is a roundabout way of saying don’t give me gyp about this Jungle Book, which, as it happens, is immersive and engaging and a success in its own particular way.

This is a live-action/CGI reboot, directed by Jon Favreau (Swingers, Elf, Iron Man Elf!), and even though the 3D glasses pinch, as they always do, it is stunning to look at, and you will marvel. It is wondrously detailed — breathtakingly detailed. You can see every leaf on every tree, every hair on every beast, every pore on every snout, every feather on every bird. It feels more real than if it were real. It feels as if you’re there. In other words, this takes you, visually, where hand-drawn cartoons never have, and never will, and I include Scooby-Doo. (Love Scooby-Doo, but never properly felt I was there, on that ghost train.)


It is narrated by the black panther Bagheera (Ben Kingsley, voice of) who has watched over Mowgli, the orphaned ‘man-cub’, since he was a baby. Mowgli (as played by Neel Sethi, who is quite adorable in that American cutesy way) is the only live-action figure. He was ‘filmed in downtown LA’, as the end credits note, but as he scampers up trees and swings from branches and generally interacts with the landscape you would never know. Mowgli loves his jungle life, but as Bagheera tells him, it’s time to leave the wolf family that raised him — I welled up at this; I cannot lie — for his own species in the ‘man-village’.

So far, so familiar. But this doesn’t then settle for being the tale of a small boy brought up in the wild to speak American and sing up-tempo songs while juggling mangoes. This isn’t The Revenant for kiddies exactly, but it is far darker, more hardcore than the original, and more faithful to the Rudyard Kipling stories, with treacherous landscapes, deaths, woundings, claws-out fights and a Shere Khan (the tiger; Idris Elba) so fearsome and so disfigured by ‘the red flower’ (the animals’ name for ‘fire’) that even I found him quite terrifying. And as for Kaa (Scarlett Johansson), she is everything an evil snake should be: fat, obscenely slithery, with hateful, mesmerisingly yellow eyes.

As Mowgli treks to the man-village, the basic structure of the film remains the basic structure of most films of this type: jeopardy, downtime, jeopardy, downtime, jeopardy, jeopardy, downtime. The best downtime occurs when the bear, Baloo (Bill Murray), arrives on the scene, as he’s big and silly and comical — the film was in desperate need of some humour by this point — and sings ‘Bare Necessities’ while Mowgli sits on his belly and they float down the river. It’s idyllic until Mowgli — jeopardy alert! — is kidnapped by those pesky monkeys and taken to a spectacular ruined city as ruled by King Louie (Christopher Walken), a giant, malevolent orangutan who wants Mowgli to ‘summon the red flower’. Walken gets to sing ‘I Wanna Be Like You’, which, racist undertones aside (you can look up that debate, if you’ve the mind), is just perfect somehow.

The fact that we’ve all seen the original means that we can’t unsee it, and therefore can’t help noting certain absences. Only two songs are reprised. My favourite character, the elephant Colonel Hathi, is missing. John, Paul, George and Ringo do not appear as vultures. There is no little girl at the end, and the ending itself seems to suggest different species can cohabit very nicely, thank you. The film is told as an old-fashioned adventure, with no icky messages about belonging, and it is set in a world so miraculously rendered you won’t care it’s been done before, because it’s never been done like this.

Subscribe to The Spectator Australia today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Subscribe – Try a month free


Show comments
  • Sarka

    I’m looking forward to this movie. But Kaa is NOT an “evil snake”. He can be scary, but is on the side of good. Johansson seems a strange choice for Kaa…but I suppose the story is lacking in female roles.

  • Nick

    Me and the missus took our two grandchildren to watch the movie on Saturday.Now originally,I was going to stay at home and watch the racing,which was later abandoned due to the rain.

    And I’m glad,because the movie was excellent and one of the best I’ve seen for a while.The special effects are great,the characters were great and there was not a single period where the movie slowed down or became boring.

    Idris Elbas voice as Shere Khan was perfect and quite intimidating and the scene with the snake Kaa talking to and hypnotizing Mogli up a tree was spot on.

    I often watch a so called block buster on DVD or the TV and think that I’m glad that I didn’t pay to see it at the cinema.But The Jungle Book was worth every penny.

    • SunnyD

      cheers, it’s on my to do list this weekend

      • Nick

        I hope you enjoy it as it is a lovely film.

  • sebastian2

    “quite adorable in that American cutesy way” – had reservations about that. Calling his animal allies “Guys” seemed …….. not quite right. And there was some slurring of pronunciation. A slight Indian accent would’ve been better. That said, the animation was extraordinary. King Louie? Orang Utan (native to Indonesia/Malaysia not India)? Sounding like a mafioso? No gyrating dance with Baloo dressed in a grass skirt and coconuts? (One of the original cartoon’s most memorable scenes.) The original song was better. Elephants emerging through the jungle mist – stunning. Pushed you back in your seat.

    All highly realistic, which is an irony given that so much of the jungle and landscape it depicts so superbly, is disappearing.

    I’d go again.

Close