The cheaper alternative to conventional conflict for opponents of the US (and Australia) is to engineer endless ‘wars of the flea’. It took twenty years in Afghanistan, but didn’t we just get schooled on that one! The theory was outlined by US scholar Robert Taber: in the war against the flea, the state suffers the dog’s disadvantages – too much to defend against a small, agile, ubiquitous enemy.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Get 10 issues
for $10
Subscribe to The Spectator Australia today for the next 10 magazine issues, plus full online access, for just $10.
- Delivery of the weekly magazine
- Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
- Spectator podcasts and newsletters
- Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or
Unlock this article
You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first month for free, then just $2 a week for the remainder of your first year.
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
SUBSCRIBEAlready a subscriber? Log in