It is good to see that proposals for electoral reform keep coming in. Some of them are designed to prevent any unfortunate lapses in the future which might result in the public actually expressing their own opinion. One example is the plebiscite on same sex marriage, where it is said we do not need a vote on that issue because we already know what the people think and that arguing about it will just upset people before they enter into marital bliss.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe for just $2 a week
Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.
- Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
- The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
- Spectator podcasts and newsletters
- Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or
Unlock this article
You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first month for free, then just $2 a week for the remainder of your first year.
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
SUBSCRIBEAlready a subscriber? Log in