Radio

Radio 4's bold challenge to government policy

21 May 2016

9:00 AM

21 May 2016

9:00 AM

Monday’s ‘World on the Move Day’ on Radio 4 was a bold challenge to government policy and proof that radio is much the most flexible, the most accommodating, the most powerful medium when compared with TV. Without much ado, the day’s planned schedule was squeezed, manipulated, overturned to allow the team behind the Today programme to mastermind a live discussion throughout the day about the migration issue, as if to say to the government, here’s what people not just in the UK but from around the world care about. Let’s listen to them and see what solutions they might have to offer.

Angelina Jolie Pitt was the biggest prize as she took over the You and Yours slot to lead a live lunchtime debate on Radio 4 and the World Service that looked beyond the overcrowded boats in the Mediterranean and the homeless refugees queuing up on the borders of the EU to the migrants who have already arrived but not settled and to the reluctant hosts themselves who are not always so welcoming or accommodating. Why did she choose to use this forum? Because it gave her immediate access to a global audience. But not only that. She knows that speaking on the BBC gives her an authority, a cachet that surpasses her own glamour. Ponder that, Mr Whittingdale.

The BBC’s pulling power depends on its back story, those 90 years of producing programmes like Science Stories, Radio 4’s attempt to breathe life into areas of knowledge that for many are offputting or misunderstood. On Wednesday night Naomi Alderman looked at the myths about Florence Nightingale, the lady with the lamp, forever imagined as the ultimate nurse, gentle, self-effacing, a vision of charity in her nun-like habit. Nonsense, said Alderman. Even her own sister, Parthenope, thought Florence was ‘a shocking nurse’, driven not by compassion but by ambition. She was an intellectual, who aged nine was writing letters to her mother in French and at 16 worked into the night on her Greek homework.


When she arrived at Scutari on the outskirts of Istanbul, less than a fortnight after the horrors of the Charge of the Light Brigade, she was shocked not so much by the stench of blood, the terrible wounds, the inhumanity she witnessed, but by the chaos, the lack of any organisation, the way that individual deaths were not even recorded. What drove her to work so hard was not so much her desire to relieve that suffering but to take note of it, quantify it, compile detailed lists about it. Her legacy has nothing to do with lamps and veils, said Alderman, but instead should be looked for in the thousands of pages of lists, columns, tables she compiled and published in the years that followed her experience in the Crimea.

‘Her numbers screamed out for change,’ said Alderman, who as a successful novelist knows how to thread her words together, spinning a web that attracts and then holds our attention. ‘Her columns of figures spoke as loudly as the cries of pain of the soldiers,’ because Nightingale created from them beautifully coloured pie charts. These showed visually and most powerfully that there were more deaths from poor sanitation at Scutari than battle wounds. Alderman spoke with such passion about the brilliant effectiveness of these diagrams that she made Nightingale’s statistical obsessions as riveting as a narrative about her life.

I wonder how many Archers addicts have given up, no longer able to withstand the nightly dose of wailing and despair as Helen languishes in prison and Rob continues to flex his insidious authority. I’m off now for a fortnight and am so relieved to be getting away from Ambridge. So far I’ve stayed loyal, listening every night out of the creepy belief that in some way I’m supporting Helen and Henry just by being there. The slow burn of this storyline has worked brilliantly. Why else would I be so convinced that I need to help Helen, as if she really existed? But it’s disturbing too, worming its way each night deeper and deeper into my thoughts, and I’m not sure I can take it any more.

Now the soon-to-be-departed editor Sean O’Connor has announced that he’s leaving behind him an even nastier legacy, which will take even longer to unfold, and inspired this time by Shakespeare, no less. That dastardly misogynist Brian is intending to replace Adam (his stepson) as heir to Home Farm with his love-child Ruairi when he reaches 18 (five years to go). It’s too much, far too much.

Subscribe to The Spectator Australia today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Subscribe – Try a month free


Show comments
  • Hugh Small

    Florence Nightingale did NOT design her pie charts to show “that there were more deaths from poor sanitation at Scutari than battle wounds”. She designed them to show that it was possible to control infectious disease. That’s why they show a huge decrease in the second half of the war after the new administration took preventive measures. She used the diagrams to successfully argue for preventive measures in the homes of the poor in Britain, with the result that national life expectancy increased by half before any medical treatment was possible.
    see: http://www.florence-nightingale-avenging-angel.co.uk/?p=861
    Tim Harford got it right in his article in the Financial Times: http://www.ft.com/poisonedstatistics

    • Mr Grumpy

      Yes, yes, all very well, but she didn’t care like lovely Angelina does. Plus she was hideously white and has already been justly knocked off her perch to make way for the far more significant Mary Seacole. Bullsh** rules!

  • Bonkim

    BBC sounds more like a propaganda channel for black, Muslim, LGBT, and refugee issues – very little of the BBC’s content is of interest to British listeners or viewers. unless BBC has taken it on itself to redefine what British culture and values should be.

    • Augustus

      You can talk forever about different cultures and ethnicity, but government policy on immigration and integration should simply be: Why do you want to come here? And, are you willing to try your best to make something of your life here? If the answers are positive there may be hope. If the response is negative no amount of mollycoddling will produce future loyal and fully integrated citizens.

      • Bonkim

        Idealism is dead – today’s immigrants are mercenaries wanting to graze on greener pastures – the location and history of no consequence and they will desert if there are better opportunities elsewhere.

        Given that the earth is grossly overpopulated the days of the nation state are numbered, and growth supra-national political systems such as the EU is attracting weak-minded politicians as David Cameron to opt out of their responsibilities to the people that elected them. In the future the British Parliament would be little better than a local council talking shop with all major decisions taken in Brussels by faceless bureaucrats.

  • hugh

    Nothing balanced about Monday’s propaganda fest. The BBC at its authoritarian, biased, worst.

    BTW, have you listened to the butchery Brave New World is getting on Radio 4?

    • gunnerbear

      I thought that version of BNW isn’t too bad actually.

  • Tom M

    For the first time in 40 years I turned R4 off the other day. When I turned it on the afternoon play was running. I half listened until something grabbed my attention (paraphrasing a bit here)
    “…..this Mormon bloke thinks he want to change me. He thinks I am gay. Just wait till he finds out I’m trans….”.
    I’ve had enough. From Woman’s hour to the afternoon play and discussions on Shakespeare everything now turns on trans, cis, gender fluidity (whatever that is). I have nothing against any of them but they are tiny minorities. Why is the BBC running this ridiculous campaign?

    • wasteman

      It’s demoralisation and normalisation of absurdities and it’s purpose is to change the perception of reality of every westerner to such an extent that despite the abundance of information no
      one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interests of
      defending themselves, their families, their community, and their
      country. It’s a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is
      divided into four basic stages. The first one being demoralization.

      It takes from fifteen to twenty years to demoralize a
      nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years
      which requires to educate one generation of students in the country of
      your enemy exposed to the ideology of the enemy. In other words
      Marxist-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at
      least three generations of American students without being challenged or
      counter-balanced by the basic values of Americanism, American
      patriotism. …

Close