Mind your language

Where ‘poop’ came from

The strange and windy history of Danny Alexander’s nursery word

28 March 2015

9:00 AM

28 March 2015

9:00 AM

Danny Alexander recounted in the Diary last week his daughter’s efforts in making unicorn poop. This is something of a historic marker. Most members of the cabinet in previous generations have been unforthcoming on faecal matters, particularly when it comes to comestibles.

In other countries there is less reticence. In Catalonia, Christmas isn’t Christmas without the Caga Tió, a log that is encouraged to defecate sweetmeats by being hit with a stick during the singing of a traditional song. ‘Shit, log, shit turrón, hazelnuts and cream cheese,’ it goes. ‘If you don’t shit well, I’ll give you a whack with the stick.’ This seems a good metaphor for Treasury attitudes to taxpayers. When the Independent ran an article last year about Christmas customs round the world, it explained the Caga Tió in terms of poo. It seems to me that poo and poop liberate public discussion of scatological matters in much the same way as bonking enabled the middle classes to read about carnal encounters in their newspapers in the 1980s without feeling that they had breached verbal taboos.

It is something of a surprise that the Oxford English Dictionary does not record poo in the excremental sense from any date earlier than 1960, and that none of its citations are other than Australian or American before this century. Perhaps in earlier times the word was regarded as slang that fell outside the main dictionary’s catchment. An interjection pooh was in use in the 16th century, but only in contexts expressing disgust did it edge into the stercoral semantic field.

Mr Alexander’s poop has a better established pedigree. In 1736, Nathan Bailey was geographically and acoustically specific in defining the verb: ‘To break Wind backwards softly.’ There were centuries of pooping like a horn (as in Chaucer), so I don’t think we need resort to the Low Dutch for the origin of windy pooping. By the 19th century, the nursery had deployed the term for more solid offerings, whether of unicorns or doggies. In the nursery it stayed until my husband’s medical colleagues extended juvenile vocabulary for the easier discussion of delicate subjects with patients. Pee and poo are par now, and we’re ready for the ‘Great British Poop Off’.

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first 10 weeks for just $10

Show comments
  • doctorseraphicus

    I suppose, then, that the name Winnie-the-Pooh did not carry the same connotations as it does nowadays: all of my children have chortled at the name and wondered why that name was chosen.

  • Yam_I_am
  • Whatever you call it, it’s revolting. Why couldn’t it be some form of dust? And: why do humans have the most revolting poop of all? Let us be frank: even dog turds are not quite as disgusting.

    • Phil T Tipp

      This is very revealing. Was mummy a bit of a potty tyrant?

      • Anyone that chooses a chimp as an avatar is clearly not right in the head.

        • Phil T Tipp

          The chimp in the space suit is allegorical for all of us modern humans and our unhappy position twixt the caves and the stars. You are a simian too, a naked hominid, and don’t you forget it.

          • No, I am an excellent soul in a rather lovely body and my husband last called me ‘gem of the world’. Off you go.

          • Phil T Tipp

            Don’t go getting ideas above your station chimp-lady. You’ll only let yourself down. Ta ta.

          • Up yours, Bananabrain.

          • Phil T Tipp

            Kissy, kissy. NO TONGUES, stop it now.

          • In yer dreams!

          • Phil T Tipp

            I dare not dream, wicked succubus. Stop it.

          • Heh heh heh