About 20 years ago, a seat-warming Senator came out of hiding and declared his thought bubble that Australia’s coast was getting overpopulated and that Australians should consider populating the centre of the country. I challenged the hapless Senator to lead ‘by example’ and set up home in the Simpson Desert. In a column at the time, I added a comment hoping that his wife and kids would not accompany him, as it would be a shame to think there was more than one dope in the same family.

92 per cent of Australians live within 50kms of the coast and rivers, that’s what we like to do!

Base load power stations are subsequently located within populated coastal areas and remote areas of Australia draw their energy via fossil-fuelled generators, largely from diesel transported past their door by ships to distribution centres then redelivered locally by trucks or barges.

As efforts to decarbonise global energy systems expand, one of the answers could be to use floating nuclear power plants (FNPPs).

Many countries have floating power stations in existing ports, although these are diesel or gas-powered. The Russians were the first in 2019 to place a 70MW FNPP, the Akademik Lomonosov into the remote town of Vilyuchinsk, in far-east Russia, replacing the closed Bilibino nuclear plant and the aging Chaunskaya coal power plant. (I am informed by a colleague that the ‘must do’ breakfast in Vilyuchinsk is toast and caviar.)

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) International Symposium on floating nuclear power plants (FNPPs) took place from November 14-15, 2023, in Vienna. This meeting highlighted growing interest in installing small modular reactors (SMRs) and Micro Modular Reactors (MMRs) on floating barges or ships to provide clean electricity and heat for remote coastal locations, to decarbonise energy activities by providing grid-scale electricity, unlocking cost reductions through repeat production in shipyards

Topan Setiadipura, the Co-Chair of the Symposium and Head of the Research Centre for Nuclear Reactor Technology (BRIN) in Indonesia said:

‘Floating NPPs are an interesting option for Indonesia as many power companies already have floating diesel or gas power plants. However, acquiring more information and knowledge is essential to understanding whether embarking countries like Indonesia could use FNPPs in the future to replace fossil-fuelled floating power plants.’

During the symposium, discussions focused on current and future designs of FNPPs and their uses. Participants also examined the specific challenges that the mobility of FNPPs pose for their licensing, regulation, transportation, and application of safeguards. Nuclear safety and security were discussed, including the extent to which the current standards and practices can, or cannot, be applied to FNPPs. The symposium’s concluding session identified the next possible steps to enable the deployment of floating nuclear power plants, including the mechanism to improve communication between the nuclear and maritime industry on one hand, and regulators on the other, with a focus on application of security and safeguards.

Singapore is already thinking about the possibility of using nuclear power, and it is sending people abroad to learn more about the technology. One issue for them is their lack of open space, which limits their ability to use utility-scale renewable energy farms. FNPPs will be a positive in the mix of energy strategies given Singapore’s already significant amount of commercial waterfront well clear of residential areas.

Recently, US Based shipping company Crowley Maritime announced a memorandum of understanding with Virginia-based nuclear power company BWX Technologies to develop a ship concept that includes a microreactor for generating zero-carbon emission nuclear power for shore-side applications.

This FNPP ship would supply small-scale nuclear energy to shore-side locations, providing 50mW power to military bases, backup utility grids, and other situations where traditional electricity sources are not feasible.

The concept 115m vessel aims to provide high levels of safety and security with in-house vessel design and nuclear components, fuel, and services. The ship will combine traditional propulsion with a small modular reactor that can be activated and deactivated as needed. It can deliver the power to shore using buoyed power delivery cables and has shallow draft hulls for manoeuvrability in military activities or during disaster response to remote areas when harbour access is limited.

The US Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency – a department familiar with managing both nuclear risk and disaster recovery – could be a better choice to refresh America’s long-forgotten legacy of projecting power (electrical power) from the sea to shore, but has to wrestle with the US Navy’s secretive grip on nuclear technology.

Nuclear energy has already been in use for 70 years in naval ships, commercial ships, and icebreakers propulsion. Today there are 162 nuclear-powered vessels floating on top and below the 70 per cent of the planet’s surface, the oceans.

My support for nuclear power on ships has been a matter of record since I bluffed my way on board the nuclear-powered passenger cargo ship Savannah in 1967. The operational capability of that ship was 25 times more than any conventional powered vessel of the same size. In marine propulsion applications, absolutely nothing comes close to nuclear … and nothing has changed.

Floating NPPs can be built in a factory, assembled in a shipyard, and transported to a site, all of which may help to speed up construction and keep costs down. Canada, China, Denmark, South Korea, Russia, and America are each working on marine SMRs and MMRs designs, some are in advanced development.

However, FNPPs are not in competition with land-based SMR and MMRs, but provide an attractive option for many remote regional areas such as Vilyuchinsk, the lead example in FNPP installations.

About 5,500 nautical miles south of Vilyuchinsk, in the city of Canberra, the Lilliputian leaders of Australia, despite neighbours Indonesia and Singapore investigating FNPPs, have convinced the locals to ignore nuclear and have blanketed huge tracts of their productive farmland with unreliable solar and wind farms. Australians should pay attention, get off their backsides, and dump such hopeless leadership.

‘Nuclear energy is an extraordinary asset whose full potential we need to untap if we are to keep climate change in check.’ – Rafael Mariano Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) March 2024