Ancient and modern

Pliny the Younger on Fifa

6 June 2015

9:00 AM

6 June 2015

9:00 AM

In any huge enterprise (like Fifa), where does the rot begin? Pliny the Younger mused on this question in a letter to a friend about a games festival held in the Roman colony Vienna (Vienne, south of Lyons).

Vienna had been celebrating Greek-style gymnastic games as a result of a bequest, when the town’s mayor decided to abolish them; they were corrupting, unlike good, honest Roman games. The case was contested and came before the emperor in Rome, with Pliny one of the assessors. There the mayor, ‘a true Roman and fine citizen’, came out on top. He was supported, Pliny wrote, by one Mauricus, another Roman famed for straight talking. Courageously, in Pliny’s view, Mauricus expressed the opinion that such Greek fripperies had no place in Rome either.


Pliny then gives another example of Mauricus’ courage. He was dining with the emperor Nerva, who seemed to be getting on very well with one Veiento, a state informer with blood on his hands. Conversation turned to the murderous career of the recently dead Messalinus, another informer as bloody as Veiento, and Nerva wondered what he would be doing were he still alive. ‘Dining with us,’ replied Mauricus. Crunch.

That set Pliny reflecting on the bigger picture. Yes, the corrupting Greek games in Vienna had been abolished. But, he went on, at least Vienna’s vices went no further than Vienna. What, however, about Rome’s? Its commitment to Greek-style games spread a more general corruption far and wide: ‘For in our bodies, as in government,’ he concluded, ‘the most serious diseases are those diffused from the head.’

Which brings us back to Fifa. Soccer may not be corrupting per se. But turn it into a multimillion-pound, worldwide empire with wealthy sponsors, an unaccountable head, servile officials and grasping associations far too complicit to boycott it, and Pliny’s parallel rings true. The rot begins at the head. But does Blatter’s resignation change that? No. It was nothing to do with Fifa. It came from external legal pressure. No virtue in that. The jury on Fifa is still out.

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first 10 weeks for just $10


Show comments
  • John Carins

    This is what happens in any dictatorship. FIFA is a dictatorship and like all dictatorships before, it is about to meet its day of judgement. .

    • thomasaikenhead

      FIFA has always been a democracy, which is how Sepp Blatter got re-elected so many times!

  • Hermine Funkington-Rumpelstilz

    I find all these articles about fat men’s boys clubs heartwarming. They don’t like it up them do they?

  • Roger Hudson

    A great indicator , just compare the football history of Blatter versus Platini.
    I can’t find evidence of Blatter even playing football at school.

    • thomasaikenhead

      That would be the Platini that used to support Blatter until he realised he was not going to succeed Blatter?

      No doubt Platini is a man of honour and integrity and can be relied upon to show that UEFA will insist that Germany is held to account for the allegations of arms sold to Saudi Arabia in order to obtain World Cup bid votes?

  • thomasaikenhead

    Let us hope that all those that have pontificated and condemned FIFA and Sepp Blatter maintain their high standards with regard to Mo Farah, Alberto Salazar and NIke given the recent revelations of Panorama?

Close