I enjoyed playing in the Surrey Mixed Pairs with my friend Guy Hart last Sunday. It was a friendly event, and Guy, with his frequent witty quips, makes me laugh more than anyone. We played pretty well (not too many mistakes), so I must admit we were disappointed with our below par result.
The thing is, the event was mixed in more ways than one: plenty of good players, but plenty of weak ones too. Poor players give out plenty of ‘gifts’, and if you’re not lucky enough to get any – and we weren’t – it’s hard to do well. Early on, for instance, we sat against a couple who announced that they were playing ‘three Weak Twos’. ‘What’s your strong bid?’ Guy asked. ‘Er… 3NT,’ said North. ’No other?’ Guy wondered. ‘Well, 4NT would be stronger.’ I admit, we metaphorically rubbed our hands together at the prospect of thrashing them. What hubris! We got a zero straight away (see diagram).
A confusing auction. West (Guy) led the ♦️Q. Declarer won in dummy and played a club to the ♣️10. Even when it wins, you still have a problem: with only one entry to dummy to lead clubs again, you need to first cash the ♠️K, cross to the ♥️K and cash the ♠️A in the hope East started with two spades. Bingo.
In fact what declarer did was cross to the ♥️K and play a club. I won with the ♣️A and continued a diamond. Had I played a spade, as perhaps I should, I would have broken up the squeeze. Declarer won with the ♦️A, and ran hearts and clubs, ending with ♠️K, ♦️10, ♣️2. Poor Guy was down to ♠️QJ ♦️J. On the last club, he was squeezed. He pitched the ♦️J and declarer, looking dumfounded, cashed the ♦️10. ‘I was squeezed, well done,’ said Guy. ‘Actually I only had the singleton ♠️K,’ she said kindly, ‘but you weren’t to know.’
Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.
You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first month for free, then just $2 a week for the remainder of your first year.






