<iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-K3L4M3" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">

Flat White

What would JK Rowling say about the Tickle v Giggle case?

11 April 2024

10:19 PM

11 April 2024

10:19 PM

At the same time Harry Potter author, JK Rowling, is challenging highly contentious gender ideology in Scotland’s anti-hate speech law, gender ideology law is also being tested in Australia’s Federal Court.

Ambiguously, gender ideology says that either fluid gender identity replaces, or is separate from, a person’s sex. This contested theory stands juxtaposed to the biological worldview that sex is immutable and unchangeable.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Subscribe for just $2 a week

Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.

  • Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
  • The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
  • Spectator podcasts and newsletters
  • Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or

Unlock this article

REGISTER


Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Close