Covid vaccination, which was previously made compulsory and denied employment to the unvaccinated, may well become an election issue.

Let me say, I have been vaccinated since the age of 2 against everything.

But I wasn’t forced.

The Morrison government, supported by the Opposition, made vaccination mandatory. It was, effectively, forced.

And they told us which vaccinations we had to use: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Moderna.

I have done a lot of reading on the little tablet ivermectin which, taken with other recommended medicines, had, for years, been proven safe and effective.

But you weren’t allowed to mention the little tablet.

You were cancelled.

Doctors in Queensland were threatened with jail.

One young female doctor I could name here, still doesn’t have a medical practicing certificate because she prescribed ivermectin to a seriously ill patient who recovered.

The Albanese government won’t have a Royal Commission into the Coronavirus response; but there are questions that must be answered.

The regulatory authority, amongst others here, is the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

Whilst always maintaining that they operate as a strictly independent body, Australia has one of the highest proportion of funding of these regulatory bodies made by drug companies.

Wasn’t the TGA founded as an independent institute?

Many see this almost exclusive reliance on pharmaceutical industry funding as a possible conflict of interest given the TGA is approving applications from drug companies.

We aren’t told how much the drug companies were paid to provide vaccinations.

The poor taxpayer was told vaccinations were free.

They weren’t.

I suspect we paid billions to drug companies.

This has led some to ask whether ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were banned for reasons other than public health.

Is the Therapeutic Goods Administration still taking money from Big Pharma?

Which drug companies are paying our regulatory authorities and how much money is involved?

Why hasn’t the current Federal Minister for Health been questioned about this in the Parliament?

Surely the payments should either be stopped or the Therapeutic Goods Administration should be shut down.

What other direct payments are made by pharmaceutical companies to various health authorities, even state health departments?

Surely the case now exists, overwhelmingly, for regulatory authorities to be subjected to their own watchdog…

Do we need a Drug and Vaccination Board, independent of the drug regulator, to investigate these funding practices but, more importantly, to investigate what compulsory vaccination has done to the health and employment of many Australians?

We have an independent safety board for airlines and their passengers, why not for patients?

The overriding issue is this…

Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were banned.

You couldn’t mention them, talk about them or recommend them.

Big Pharma was raking in the money from government.

It had to be AstraZeneca, Pfizer, or Moderna so said the regulatory authority; so said government.

Let’s start with one question.

How much money do these drug companies pay to the same regulatory agencies that are supposed to be regulating the drug industry?

Is it true that the Therapeutic Goods Administration relies almost exclusively on the pharmaceutical industry for its funding?

Is this why ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were banned?

The drug industry presumably won the day with the government and the regulatory authorities.

Think about it.

We are short on critical answers.

Get 10 issues for just $10

Subscribe to The Spectator Australia today for the next 10 magazine issues, plus full online access, for just $10.

SUBSCRIBE 10 issues for $10 REGISTER 3 articles a month

Already a subscriber? Log in