<iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-K3L4M3" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">

Flat White

Are pro-Voice advocates preying on children’s emotions?

6 September 2023

3:50 PM

6 September 2023

3:50 PM

The Hon Sarah Game, One Nation MLC in South Australia, published a letter addressed to the Labor Minister for Education, Training and Skills, Blair Boyer, regarding concerns that high school children were being visited by pro-Voice advocates and Members of Parliament after the issue was raised by constituents.

Game writes:

‘Many of my constituents have voiced their concerns about the possibility that schools may foster a one-sided approach. I share their view that our schools should strive to offer a balanced perspective, particularly on such a significant matter. It is vital that students receive well-rounded, unbiased information, ensuring that representatives from both sides of the debate have an opportunity to be heard.’

If true, this is a shocking overreach from those parliamentarians and a violation by the schools of their responsibility to students.

To that we may add, why is anyone from the Voice debate visiting schools?

Students are not old enough to vote in the referendum. The Voice to Parliament is not a question for them in the same way that elections for the next political leadership are not for them. That will come later, when they are adults.

The only reason for a pro-Voice advocate to visit a school would be to infiltrate the mind of a child with partisan politics to then emotionally manipulate their parents into voting.

Such visits represent the use of children for political purposes in an adult debate.

As reported in the Spectator Australia this week, 10-year-olds have been indoctrinated with the philosophy of inherited race guilt.


Race guilt.

They have been encouraged to write letters of ‘apology’ to Aboriginal people.

‘We are sorry for everything that we have done.’

‘We took your land and we have now we feel sad of what we have done’.

‘Aboriginal people should have many more rights and should be treated nicely they should be an Aboriginal Voice to Parliament.’

These children didn’t do anything. Radical race-baiting teachers are not only spinning lies about Australia’s history, they are implying that a child carries the historic guilt of their skin colour and must atone by not only writing ridiculous letters, but vocally supporting a political movement.

This is sick.

Somewhere along the road, politicians have forgotten that school is designed to teach children the basic tools they need to engage with society. It is not meant to be a hunting ground for activists or political ideology.

The Voice to Parliament is not the first time that children have been targeted by political movements.

Climate Change advocates have spent so long saturating the curriculum that a brand new phobia has been invented: ‘eco anxiety’. It is as if we are sinking into the Dark Ages only instead of having generations of children terrified of burning in hell, they have been led to believe by high-ranking members of the United Nations that the world is literally ‘boiling’.

Kids are under the impression that they are destined to die in a climate apocalypse unless they commit themselves to a life of socialism and green tax, while rainbow activists have wrapped their classrooms in gender-confusing propaganda the result of which is leaving some children so emotionally damaged that they reject their bodies to the point of hormone manipulation and catastrophic surgery.

Who is going to stand up for our children and kick these radicalised, activist teachers out of school system?

There is an urgent need to rip the curriculum apart and drain the activism out of education before it poisons the minds of our future citizens.

In the meantime, the very least pro-Voice parliamentarians could do is stop preying on the minds of children and take their argument directly to adults. The Voice to Parliament represents the biggest Constitutional change in our history – the creation of racial supremacy and inherited spiritual privilege for one group of Australians over the rest. It will unleash land grabs, lockouts, race taxes, and a fortune’s worth of public money.

Constitutional changes are marriages without divorce and are not to be entered into riding a ‘vibe’ or because someone guilt-tripped kids during math class.


Flat White is written and edited by Alexandra Marshall.

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.


Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Close