<iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-K3L4M3" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">

World

Why the CEO of Coutts had to go

28 July 2023

1:15 AM

28 July 2023

1:15 AM

In the end, the only real surprise was that it took so long. The chief executive of NatWest, Dame Alison Rose, had already been forced to step down after it became clear she had leaked confidential information about Nigel Farage’s personal financial affairs to the BBC. The board has been under sustained pressure all week. And now the man at the very heart of the scandal, Peter Flavel, the CEO of Coutts, has stepped down as well.

If the bank is to have any future there is a lot of repair work to be done – and Flavel was hardly the man to lead that

That was surely the right decision. A private bank only exists to be discreet and to provide exceptional service. It was clear that under Falvel, Coutts had long since stopped doing that. If the bank is to have any future there is a lot of repair work to be done – and Flavel was hardly the man to lead that.


After Rose’s hasty middle-of-the-night departure, it was clear that more heads would roll at NatWest. It was of course completely unacceptable for the head of a major bank to brief journalists about the private affairs of a client. And yet that was only one element of the story. It was just as unacceptable for the bank to be compiling dossiers on the political views of its clients, especially when the dossier in question was a muddled, poorly written jumble of half-truths scraped together from Google and Twitter. After all, Coutts is meant to be an elite private bank, catering to a handful of entrepreneurs and the mega-rich and providing high levels of service. It is the financial equivalent of staying in a five star hotel. Everything it meant to be taken care of, with maximum discretion, high levels of professionalism and, if you are lucky, even a modicum of charm. On any one of those measures, it clearly failed.

Indeed, it is hard to see why anyone would want to bank with it right now. A politically motivated group of compliance staff will be constantly monitoring everything you do to check whether it meets their own priggish standards. At any moment, they might terminate your account. And when they do, they may even trash you in the press to make themselves look good. Added on to their outrageous fees, it is not a very attractive proposition.

In reality, there is a massive task ahead for Coutts. Private banking is a crowded industry, with lots of excellent players. For anyone who has three or four million to invest there are lots of different options; after all, banks have always liked very rich people, and are more than happy to look after them. True, Coutts had one of the best brand names in the business, as a banker to royalty and the aristocracy for generations. But in the space of just a few weeks, it has comprehensively trashed its reputation. Flavel’s departure is a welcome start – but whoever takes over has a lot to fix.

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.


Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Close