<iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-K3L4M3" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">

Bridge

Bridge | 02 April 2022

2 April 2022

9:00 AM

2 April 2022

9:00 AM

I don’t play rubber bridge nearly as much as I used to, but I still enjoy the occasional game at TGR’s. The stakes normally range from £10 to £30 per hundred. Although I play at the lower end, it’s still a nerve-racking amount, especially when cutting into a game with top-class regulars like Gunnar Hallberg and Robert Sheehan. But this is no place for sissies – the bridge is fast; people get heated; and a big loss can feel a bit like getting mugged. Many years ago, the late great Oswald Jacoby tried to warn a friend against playing rubber bridge. The man responded, ‘What’s the worst that can happen? I play like an idiot and lose a lot of money?’ Jacoby shook his head: ‘That’s the best that can happen.’

But it’s all great fun – if you don’t mind looking like a fool. The other day, Gunnar pulled a fast one on a lesser player who took it in good spirits (see diagram).

West led the ♥4 to East’s ♥J, and Gunnar played… the ♥A! He knew that if he won with the ♥Q and took a losing club finesse, West would have no problem switching to a spade; creating the illusion that the ♥Q was with East was his only hope. Sure enough, Gunnar crossed to the ◆A, and ran the ♣Q – and West won and played the ♥8 to Gunnar’s ♥Q. Not the most thoughtful defence – but if you haven’t seen that old trick before, why wouldn’t you?

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first month for free, then just $2 a week for the remainder of your first year.


Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Close