Playing rubber bridge the other afternoon for higher stakes than usual (£20 per hundred), I had a memorably miserable time. I just couldn’t pick up any points, and began losing money at such an alarming rate that I told myself I’d play one more rubber, then quit if my cards didn’t improve.
What was I thinking of? As any rubber player knows, the bridge gods have a very cruel sense of humour; just when you’re praying for your luck to change, they give you one last, sharp kick. In my case, you could argue it was self-inflicted. I was finally dealt a wonderful hand, and bid a slam. Not only did I manage to go down by trying — unsuccessfully — to do something clever, but my partner, one of the least forgiving people I know, heaped humiliation on me in a loud and public rant. I was South.
West led the 4. 6was an excellent spot — unless West’s 4 was a singleton. I worried it was: East (Graham Orsmond) had, after all, opened 3. How could I dissuade him from giving his partner a ruff? I’m familiar with a deceptive play in this situation: but I couldn’t afford to hesitate. So when Graham won with the A, I briskly played my K underneath. My hope was that he would think it was me who held a singleton, and that West held 42. If so, playing the Q next would set up dummy’s J.
However, Graham smelt a rat. Holding just six diamonds, he knew that if the K was a singleton, his partner must hold 432 — and would surely have led the 2. So he continued with the Q. When I followed with the 2 and West with the 3… put it this way, my partner was too outraged to listen to my reasoning, and I left the club with the sound of fury still ringing in my ears.
You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first 10 weeks for just $10