Love child or bastard: the lottery of being born on the wrong side of the blanket

In the Family Way by Jane Robinson comprises over 100 heartbreaking personal accounts of illegitimacy in the 20th century

21 March 2015

9:00 AM

21 March 2015

9:00 AM

In the Family Way: Illegitimacy between the Great War and the Swinging Sixties Jane Robinson

Viking, pp.336, £18.99, ISBN: 9780670922062

My father was handed over a shop counter when he was a day old. His aunt had tried to pass him off to a hospital and couldn’t find any takers so she brought him into a draper’s shop, put him down on the counter and declared she didn’t know what she was going to do with him. The shop assistant piped up to say that her sister didn’t have any children of her own and would quite like a baby. So off she went to fetch her sister, who took him off, tucked inside her cardigan, and that, dear reader, is how he ended up with his mother and father.

I mention this prior to discussing In the Family Way because it’s about illegitimacy and some bits ring true to my father’s experience in Ireland before the war. His natural mother never wanted to see him, for instance, and he declined to pursue her: she had, he declared, been tormented enough. The whole Magdalene Sisters phenomenon wasn’t confined to Catholics; my natural grandfather was a respectable Protestant postmaster.

In the Family Way is about illegitimacy between the first world war and the 1960s. It covers the ground from several angles: the mothers, the children, the natural fathers, those who tried to abort the babies or to give them away and those who kept them, those whose families accepted the new arrival or disguised it as the mother’s sibling or those who hastened to get rid of it — though few were quite as thoroughgoing as the war veteran who drowned his wife’s misbegotten child in a washtub when he returned home.

Jane Robinson has managed to elicit over 100 personal accounts of illegitimacy and it is these letters and interviews that give the book its force — that, and the author’s manifest warm-heartedness. The book is grounded in testimonies from real people — heartbreaking, some of them.

From these various perspectives one thing is apparent, and that is that there was — is — no single right way to deal with the problem of illegitimacy. Often it was manifestly in the child’s interests to stay with the birth mother; in others, it was perfectly plain that the mother would have been better off having the child adopted because she always resented its existence. Some adoptions turned out badly, some brilliantly. What is clear from the testimonies is the fatuity of the feminist slogan for legalising abortion: ‘Every Child a Wanted Child.’ Wanted by whom?

Illegitimacy has been a problem for society right up to our own day, when it is simply irrelevant. It has been variously dealt with over time, though rarely as brutally as in 1913 when the Mental Deficiency Act made it possible to incarcerate young women for moral imbecility on the basis of being unmarried and pregnant with a second or subsequent child. That wasn’t repealed until 1959.

Some of the heroes of the story are the men and women who established — often based on a sense of Christian duty — sanctuaries for unmarried mothers and/or their children. Thomas Coram’s was the first and was a really admirable institution. So were the Dr Barnado’s homes; and the Salvation Army did extraordinary work. One of the most forward-thinking organisations was Lettice Fisher’s National Council for the Unmarried Mother and her Child, the precursor of Gingerbread, which aimed to look after single mothers and to diminish their numbers.

By contrast, Ireland’s Magdalene laundries were really grim. And even good institutions such as Barnado’s engaged in one of the most damaging, systematic endeavours to deal with the problem by shipping children off to the colonies, notably Australia, which resulted, almost inevitably, in abuse.

One unexpected group of the victims of illegitimacy were natural fathers. Many, obviously, were real bastards in that they simply abandoned their girlfriends, but a surprising number appear to have wanted a part in their children’s lives but found that in law and practice they couldn’t.

The book finishes effectively with the legalisation of abortion, which in one way solved the problem and in another didn’t. In the Family Way is about children who were born outside marriage; nowadays most wouldn’t get to be born at all. That’s not necessarily an improvement.

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.

Available from the Spectator Bookshop, £14.99 Tel: 08430 600033

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first 10 weeks for just $10

Show comments
  • Dodgy Geezer

    One should note that attitudes towards the disposal of infant children have undergone considerable change over the last 100 years.

    In 1900 infant mortality was high, and millions of mothers suffered the loss of numerous offspring. It didn’t do to get too attached to them. There were also many deaths of a bread-winning father – under these circumstances a family was commonly split up because the remaining mother could not hope to maintain the children, and giving away a child to be brought up by a friend or neighbour in small village communities was a frequent occurrence.

    By the 2000s, every single child, even badly disabled ones, are expected to survive and remain with the birth mother, who will be supported by the state if necessary. To our eyes the 1900 practices may seem callous, but I am not sure what someone from teh 1900s would say on seeing ours…

    • Zimbalist

      I’d say that someone from the 1900’s seeing our practices (200,000 unborn children destroyed each year) would declare them to be positively Satanic.

    • VUNCOOL .

      Strange to think that the Mental Deficiency Act was a product of the radical Liberal Asquith government that gave us Old Age Pensions,etc, – probably looked like a good idea at the time, as you say.

  • Charles Patrick O’Brien

    I think the label illegitimate was one to deny any rights to the child,the only innocent in the “accident” I also think many can make comments but you need to have worn that label to understand the feelings.

  • Catherine Mill

    In 2015 we in Ireland still train our family court judges etc to see all mothers before the courts as feeble minded, less evolved than men. We still lock away female victims of domestic violence to silence them.We still have child protectors who feel it is right to use electric shock therapy on abused children to silence them and place them back with the abuser. Nothing has really changed. Same secrecy, same hatred for the unhusbanded breeder/mother.Denial of full disclosure under art 6 of human rights because women get too emotional and on and on and even secret witch trials for women deemed too strong for RC Ireland. The rest of the world is kept in the dark.

  • Jackthesmilingblack

    My early life was spent in England (that’s the downside of being born in UK), and I’ve seen “out of wedlock” go from an embarrassing, shameful condition to the lifestyle of choice. Same with homosexuality. Confusing, actually. I put it down to the guilt trip that organized religion (Christianity) lays on society. Very few have the moral courage to tell those dog-collar vampires to “shove it up their donkey”.
    Jack, Japan Alps

    • Where is the objection, in Western Europe, to having children outside of marriage and wedlock, outside of religion?! There is none!